SaaS / Platform · Teams serving graphs behind an API

High-throughput agent services

APIs invoking LangGraph thousands of times a minute, where per-invoke overhead is the bill.

The problem

Per-invoke fixed cost dominates at volume

On short graphs, up to 58% of wall-clock is executor setup — pure overhead that scales linearly with request volume.

Tight state-update loops hit the Python ceiling

High-frequency state merges in inner loops are exactly where Python’s object model is slowest.

How fast-langraph fixes it

The outcome

Fixed overhead drops on every request, so throughput rises and tail latency tightens without touching your graph logic.

Questions

Does the shim add per-request overhead? +

The patch runs once at import time, not per request. After that, patched paths simply call into cached executors and Rust implementations, which is why the invoke path gets faster rather than slower.

Explore more use cases, the full feature set, or start with the quickstart.

Hit a LangGraph scaling wall?

We help production teams squeeze every bottleneck out of LangGraph — checkpoints, state, LLM costs, memory. Honest audits. Measurable fixes.